Medical Malpractice Lawyer Our Team Medical Malpractice News Articles Medical Malpractice Testimonials Medical Malpractice Frequently Asked Questions Click here to view our Blog Contact Us
Click here to view our Case Results
Information Center
Bilirubin
Birth Injury
Brachial Plexus Injury
Brain Cooling
Brain Injuries
Causes of Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Delivery Mistakes
Developmental Delay
Doctor/Hospital Malpractice
Facts and Figures
Glossary
History of Cerebral Palsy
Kaiser Malpractice
Kernicterus
Medical Malpractice
Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Paralysis
Pitocin
Post Term Pregnancy
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Premature Delivery
Screening Cerebral Palsy
Symptoms of Cerebral Palsy
Treatment
Types of Cerebral Palsy
What is Cerebral Palsy?
Contact us
Need answers fast, but can't call right now? Fill out the quick response form below and we will contact you shortly:
(800) 541-9376

Nanda v. Kaiser

Dr. Fagel obtained a settlement of $4.1 million on behalf of a child who now suffers severe cerebral palsy after doctors failed to recognize intra-uterine growth retardation and perform a timely delivery. Throughout the month prior to delivery, examinations confirmed that the mother’s fundal height was shorter than normal but no precautions were taken. When the mother was finally admitted to the labor and delivery unit, a fetal monitor showed an abnormal heart rate so a Cesarean section was ordered. One hour and ten minutes after being admitted to the L&D unit, the minor plaintiff was delivered via C-section with low vital signs. About two months later, the plaintiff was diagnosed with cerebral palsy due to lack of blood or oxygen to the brain during the delivery process.

Despite the defendants’ claims that all treatment was within the standard of care, Dr. Fagel and his associates proved that the plaintiff’s brain injuries could and should have been prevented. The defendant physicians failed to recognize and diagnose the intra-uterine growth retardation that was revealed by earlier tests, which requires earlier delivery for a more normal outcome. If the defendants had properly interpreted the fundal height measurements that were recorded throughout the month prior to delivery, proper action could have been taken and the plaintiff’s injuries would have been avoided.

 

Medical Malpractice Attorney | Site Map | Privacy Policy

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.